James II & VII, James Francis Edward Stuart, House of Stuart

Date of the "Thirty years war" and German Genocide of Blacks (1618–1648)
Dates of the British civil wars and British Genocide of Blacks (1639 - 1652), (1689), (1715 - 1745):

Portrait of a Caucasian looking James II & VII

James II & VII, House of Stuart, (14 October 1633O.S. – 16 September 1701) was King of England and King of Ireland as James II and King of Scots as James VII, from 6 February 1685. He was the last Catholic monarch to reign over the Kingdoms of England, Scotland, and Ireland.

Members of Britain's political and religious elite increasingly opposed him for being pro-French and pro-Catholic, and for his designs on becoming an absolute monarch.

When he produced a Catholic heir, the tension exploded, and leading nobles called on William III of Orange (his son-in-law and nephew) to land an invasion army from the Netherlands, which he did.

James fled England (and thus was held to have abdicated) in the Glorious Revolution of 1688. He was replaced by William of Orange who became king as William III, ruling jointly with his wife (James's daughter) Mary II.

The Glorious Revolution also called the Revolution of 1688, is the overthrow of King James II of England (James VII of Scotland and James II of Ireland) by a union of English Parliamentarians with the Dutch stadtholder William III of Orange-Nassau (William of Orange). William's successful invasion of England with a Dutch fleet and army led to his ascending the English throne as William III of England jointly with his wife Mary II of England.

James Francis Edward Stuart son of  James II - CONFIRMED!

Thus William and Mary, both Protestants, became joint rulers in 1689. James made one serious attempt to recover his crowns when he landed in Ireland in 1689 but, after the defeat of the Jacobite forces by the Williamite forces at the Battle of the Boyne in the summer of 1690, James returned to France.

He lived out the rest of his life as a pretender at a court sponsored by his cousin and ally, King Louis XIV.

The Jacobite Wars - No accurate estimate of causalities: The Jacobite Risings were a series of uprisings, rebellions, and wars in Great Britain and Ireland occurring between 1688 and 1746.

The uprisings were aimed at returning James VII of Scotland and II of England, and later his descendants of the House of Stuart, to the throne after he was deposed by Parliament during the Glorious Revolution. The series of conflicts takes its name from Jacobus, the Latin form of James.

The major Jacobite Risings were called the Jacobite Rebellions by the ruling governments. The "First Jacobite Rebellion" and "Second Jacobite Rebellion" were known respectively as "The Fifteen" and "The Forty-Five", after the years in which they occurred (1715 and 1745).

Although each Jacobite rising had unique features, they were part of a larger series of military campaigns by Jacobites attempting to restore the Stuart kings to the thrones of Scotland and England (and after 1707, Great Britain). James was deposed in 1688 and the thrones were claimed by his daughter Mary II jointly with her husband, the Dutch-born William of Orange.

After the House of Hanover succeeded to the British throne in 1714, the risings continued and intensified. They continued until the last Jacobite Rebellion ("the Forty-Five"), led by Charles Edward Stuart (the Young Pretender), who was soundly defeated at the Battle of Culloden in 1746. This ended any realistic hope of a Stuart restoration.

French Propaganda about James Francis Edward Stuart III

James Francis Edward Stuart - CONFIRMED! James Francis Edward, Prince of Wales (the Chevalier de St George, "The King Over the Water", "The Old Pretender" or "The Old Chevalier"; (1688–1766) was the son of the deposed James II of England and Ireland (James VII of Scotland). As such, he claimed the English, Scottish and Irish thrones (as James III of England and Ireland and James VIII of Scotland) from the death of his father in 1701, when he was recognised as the king of England, Scotland and Ireland by his cousin Louis XIV of France.

Obviously, the Black Scottish people were incredibly loyal to their legitimate Black kings. Thus while their kings were in exile, there was a great yearning for pictures of them. Troy and his assistants serviced this need with unknown quantities of portraits of them.

Even though many people took part in painting those portraits, they would all have looked as much alike as humanly possible, with regards to the person's features, though backgrounds and clothing could change. This portrait, like the Holy Roman Empire Emperor Charles V portrait, was likely hidden away, and thus escaped whitewashed Caucasian type destruction with the rest. The White man as James below, may, or may not be a real person. In any case, it is part of the conspiracy of the Caucasian type narratives to create fake artefacts to replace the real ones, in support of the fake history the Caucasian have created to explain their position of rule.

Fake James Francis Edward Stuart III

Following his death in 1766, he was succeeded by his son Charles Edward Stuart in the Jacobite Succession. Had his father not been deposed, there would have been only two monarchs during his lifetime; his father and himself. In reality, there were seven; his father, William III, Mary II, Anne, George I, George II and George III.

Although the ruling Protestant Stuarts died out with his half-sister, Queen Anne, the last remaining Stuarts were James and his sons, and their endeavours to reclaim the throne while remaining devoted to their Catholic faith are remembered in history as Jacobitism.

Most Truths is "half-false" and most Falsehoods is "half-truth". These statements are ambiguous, unspecific and neither here nor there, at first without dissembling them any further.

However, we will prove beyond any reasonable doubt that these statements can be concise, precise, specific, unambiguous and accurate in certain suppositions. For example, the argument between authors and general members of the public pertaining to "The myth of Scottish slaves in the Caribbean", or "The reality of Scottish slaves in the Caribbean". However, both titles are "half-false" and "half-true".

These authors are both spectacularly wrong in relation to indentured Black Scots (not slaves), Black Scots and Black Scottish aristocrats. They assumed just because they are unaware of black people who had been living in Scotland for thousands of years before them, they physically did not exist.

It is quite frightening how little all these authors, as well the general public knew about Scottish black history. In a bite-size and piece by piece, we will expose this lack of knowledge via their argument, which is useful to them in their assertions but totally misrepresented in ours. Second Scenario part a:

The Barbados Penny, Depicting Negro Looking King George III, House of Hanover 

Even more so, the Caucasian type narrative has created fake portraits and statues of their Black Kings, depicting them falsely as Caucasians. But sometimes, innocuous-seeming remnants survived and were overlooked. When they are discovered, the Caucasian type narrative concocted outrageously stupid scenarios to explain their existence. Such is the case with the Barbados Penny:

The Caucasian type historians want us to believe that they would continually mint coins with the head of one of their chattel Slaves, in Kingly fashion, wearing the sacred symbol of the British Empire and People, the British crown, and later deny these coins authenticity by citing forgery. Which self-respecting forger, past or present, would forge coins and in getting the racial identity spectacularly wrong, hopes to prosper, from such a terrible forgery? The very same Slaves who when they were not brutalising or killing them, they worried that the Slaves would kill them.

The Regal Circlet Crown of Queen Victoria 1819 - 1901 AD

And the most Alarming and Disturbing things about the image of Caucasian looking James Francis Edward Stuart III and James II is that they would be the portrait hanging on 99% of the Schools, Colleges, and Universities around the world now. It is another case of the 6 Ds, Deceitful, Deceptive, Dishonest, Dis-informative, Dumb and Dubious, including the propaganda of portraying him as a mere Painter by the French.

King George III, Mulatto looking

Let us not forget that Caucasian type narratives have also claimed to be Egyptians and Persians, as well as other original people, in environments where a Caucasian in the native clothing could not survive the Sun.

Just like they came up with a fake explanation for their Whiteness - Vitamin D, Balderdash and Piffle!

Second Scenario part b: The White Slaves narrative: The myth of Scottish slaves in the Caribbean is a sub-set of a narrative more commonly associated with the Irish in colonial America.

It has been underpinned by two polemical books: Theodore W. Allen’s The Invention of the White Race and more recently, Don Jordan and Michael Walsh’s White Cargo: The Forgotten History of Britain’s White Slaves in America. The authors were not professional historians. Allen was a writer and activist.

Jordan is a television director and Walsh a journalist, which perhaps explains the sensationalist interpretations of White Cargo.

The American historian Michael Guasco recently suggested the text should be read in ‘conjunction with more analytical and thoroughly contextualised works’ – a diplomatic way of urging caution when considering the authors’ conclusions. So, I had a look. Chapter sixteen concerns the Jacobites forcibly transported from Scotland after the uprisings in 1715 and 1746 who, according to the authors, were sometimes enslaved: those sent to the Caribbean were treated worse than those sent to America.

Whitened Bonnie Prince Charlie or the Young Pretender,

Son of James Francis Edward Stuart III, the Old Pretender.

There is no question that Jacobites were harshly dealt within what was a concerted attack on the Highland way of life – but they were never regarded or treated as chattel slaves.

Ironically, the White Cargo bibliography includes two books written by the late Anglo-Canadian journalist, John Prebble. According to Tom Devine, it is difficult to differentiate in Prebble’s work what was ‘based on reasonable research and what was the product of the imagination’.

Prebble’s ‘victim histories’ of Scotland (Glencoe, Culloden, The Highland Clearances and Darien) sold in huge numbers from the 1960s onward; exemplars of the Scottish school of pseudo-historio-graphical victimology. -Modern academics have added more nuance.

 For example, Darien (1698-1700) was indeed a disaster for Scotland and deliberate lack of support from the English in the Caribbean contributed to the death of many Scots. Whilst the slant of Prebble’s books defined a generation of victim-hood, popular histories have been replaced by online blogs. Elizabeth McQuillan’s:  ‘The hidden Scots victims of the slave trade’ in the Caledonian Mercury is completely devoid of any relevant historical evidence or analysis. Incredibly, after repeating the ‘white slaves myth’, the article suggests that ‘pressure groups [in Scotland] were looking for an official apology’ as their ancestors were white slaves.

Fake Painting about the Jacobite war

But let’s not forget the poorly planned venture represented a failed attempt at Scottish colonisation. Indeed, one scheme proposed by the Duke of Hamilton at Darien sought to import slaves to be worked to death in the gold mines of Panama.

This was not some romantic quest to establish a new society based upon Utopian socialist principles. It was a mercantilist venture designed to improve personal fortunes and Scotland’s balance of trade through colonisation and exploitation.

It seems almost embarrassing that the article ends with Robert Burns’s The Slaves Lament which concerns the African slave trade from Senegal to Virginia (a song he almost certainly didn’t author, according to Glasgow University experts. However, he nearly made a trip to Jamaica as a slave plantation overseer in 1786). Above: Fake Whitened painting depicting a scene from one of the Jacobite War.

This type of historical blog enters an echo-chamber of misinformation cited as credible sources, sometimes in response to articles about migration or the Scottish role in slavery. The ‘white slaves myth’, based upon weak foundations flourishes in the unchecked environment of the Internet. For those familiar with Hogan’s Law, this is nothing new.

A Whitened Painting of a Jacobite Royal Family, note the black boy depicted in the background

Liam Hogan has written articles on the myth of the Irish slaves, a myth which has been hijacked in America by right-wing groups and white supremacists to deflect from the legacy of black racialised chattel slavery and the ongoing quest for reparations in America. The Scottish white slaves strand differs from the Irish version in one important way. Whilst the Irish slaves myth has been used to cultivate white victimhood in America, the Scottish version is used mainly to deflect from the wider historical narrative of Scots involvement with British imperialism and specifically Caribbean slavery.

It wisnae us – white Scots were slaves first. It wisnae us – it was English. It wisnae us – it was the rich landowners. It wisnae us – the working classes weren’t involved. It wisnae us – it happened 200 years ago. Repeat ad nauseum. The end of the arguments they are having among themselves. Above: A Whitened Painting of a Jacobite Royal Family, note the black boy depicted in the background.

These aristocrats in England and Europe must really love young male Negro boys. Their explanation for this young male Negro boy in the painting, as a servant or a slave. at least they are consistent with their lies lol. End of part 4 of 7. The next blog 04/01/19: The Status and Ethnicity of the People of the Hebrides, Northern-Scotland, UK, and Black Indentures.