Black Irish, Oliver Cromwell, English Civil Wars, Scotland, Ireland

Oliver Cromwell

Oliver Cromwell

For the most part, accounts summarise the two sides that fought the English Civil Wars as the Royalist Cavaliers of Charles I of England versus the Parliamentarian Round-heads of Oliver Cromwell.

However, as with many civil wars, loyalties shifted for various reasons, and both sides changed significantly during the conflicts.

In part 5 of these articles: we recap on the previous articles via summaries and introduced Dr Samuel Johnson, and His Eyewitness Account, pertaining to the Status and Ethnicity of the People living in the Hebrides, Northern Scotland, UK.

Including direct quotations from the book,"The Journal of a tour to the Hebrides, with Samuel Johnson", around 1773 AD, describing the Status and Ethnicity of the People living in the Hebrides, Northern Scotland, UK, around that time. Followed by Warning you not to read or buy any of  any edition of the book that has been published after 1810 AD, due to all the references to the word "Black or Blacks" being deleted. WHY? To cover their tracks because of to much falsifications. If you tell to many lies, then you need 10 x more to cover each lie and sooner or later one will soon be entangled in one's webs of lies.

We have been able to authentically established the status and ethnicity of the people living in Northern Scotland around 16 and 1700 AD. Now we are about to introduce you to the historicity of indentured Black Scots and Irish to America and the Caribbean. Including displaying Negroid looking Images for 3 more Stuart Descendants.

A Mulatto looking (Mixed Race), John Stewart, Seventh Earl of Galloway

Note: Oliver Cromwell was not directly descended from Thomas Cromwell himself but from Thomas's sister, Katherine, who had married Oliver's great-great-grandfather Morgan Williams, after which the family began adopting the Cromwell surname. Judging from his portraits, Oliver may well have been a Mulatto, yet he was responsible for the Genocide of Blacks in Ireland and Scotland.

As a reminder of what Cromwell did! From the book: White People, Indians, and Highlanders: Tribal Peoples and Colonial Encounters in Scotland and America by Colin G. Calloway.

Living at the borders of an expanding English empire, Highlanders and Indians confronted colonialism with all its variegated assaults on their autonomy, land, and culture. Calloway, the son of a Highland Scot and a renowned scholar of Native American history, is well poised to explore the tangled histories of these two groups.

Page 26: The Macleods of Dunvegan suffered huge casualties when Oliver Cromwell defeated the Scots at Worcester, and Cromwell transported hundreds of Scots prisoners as indentured servants to Virginia and the West Indies.

Cromwell invaded Scotland in 1650 and 1651 and built a fort at Inverness “to preserve the peace of the country, and keep the highlands in awe, which they effectually did all his time,” wrote Daniel Defoe, who toured the region in the 1720s.

Christina Snyder review, Quote: Calloway borrows his title from Georgia's founder James Oglethorpe, who raised a motley army of "White people, Indians, and highlanders" to fight against Spanish Floridians. In Oglethorpe's time, many Britons categorised Highland Scots and Indians as savage non-whites, pointing out that both held land communally, used kinship to structure their societies, and maintained warrior traditions. Highlanders and Indians, Calloway argues, did have much in common, but he emphasises their parallel and sometimes convergent historical experiences rather than their seemingly similar cultures.

Above: The Negro Head in the family crests of Bownell, Buckworth, Haliburton, Hallyburton, Soame and Stewart, Fairbairn Book of Crests - plate 121. It has been removed or deleted from the later editions of the book. It seems to be a familiar pattern not a coincident. But WHY? the evidence is overwhelming.

Henrietta Anne Stuart, daughter of Henrietta Maria & Charles I

Ireland History
During most of this time, the Irish Confederate Wars (another civil war), continued in Ireland, starting with the Irish Rebellion of 1641 and ending with the Cromwellian conquest of Ireland.

Its incidents had little or no direct connection with those of the English Civil War, but the wars were inextricably mixed with, and formed part of, a linked series of conflicts and civil wars between 1639 and 1652 in the kingdoms of England, Scotland, and Ireland, which at that time shared a monarch, but were distinct countries in political organisation.

These linked conflicts are also known as the Wars of the Three Kingdoms by some recent historians, aiming to have a unified overview, rather than treating parts of the other conflicts as a background to the English Civil War.

1625 - Charles I of England accedes to the English throne, and shortly after marries a French, Bourbon, Roman Catholic princess, Henrietta Maria. 1628 - Charles recalls Parliament; Parliament draws up Petition of Right which Charles reluctantly accepts. John Felton murders George Villiers in Portsmouth. 1642 - 23 February - Henrietta Maria goes to the Netherlands with Princess Mary and the crown jewels. 1649 - 9 March - Engager Duke of Hamilton, Royalist Earl of Holland, and Royalist Lord Capel were beheaded at Westminster

Royal Stuart, Family Crest

Figures for casualties during this period are unreliable, but some attempt has been made to provide rough estimates. In England, a conservative estimate is that roughly 100,000 people died from war-related disease during the three civil wars. Historical records count 84,830 dead from the wars themselves.

Counting in accidents and the two Bishops' wars, an estimate of 190,000 dead is achieved.

Figures for Scotland are more unreliable and should be treated with greater caution. Casualties include the deaths of prisoners-of-war in conditions that accelerated their deaths, with estimates of 10,000 prisoners not surviving or not returning home.

There are no figures to calculate how many died from war-related diseases, but if the same ratio of disease to battle deaths from English figures is applied to the Scottish figures, a not unreasonable estimate of 60,000 people is achieved. (8,000 captured during and immediately after the Battle of Worcester were deported to New England, Bermuda and the West Indies to work for landowners as indentured labourers).

Figures for Ireland are described as "miracles of conjecture". Certainly the devastation inflicted on Ireland was unbelievable, with the best estimate provided by Sir William Petty, the father of English demography. Although Petty's figures are the best available, they are still acknowledged as being tentative.

Family Crest of the Douglas family, Scotland, UK 

They do not include the estimate of 40,000 driven into exile, some of whom served as soldiers in European continental armies, while others were sold as indentured servants to New England and the West Indies.

Many of those sold to landowners in New England eventually prospered, but many of those sold to landowners in the West Indies were worked to death. Petty estimates that 112,000 Protestants were killed through plague, war and famine, and that 504,000 Catholics were killed, giving an estimated total of 618,000 dead.

These estimates indicate that England suffered a 3.7% loss of population, Scotland a loss of 6%, while Ireland suffered a loss of 41% of its population. Putting these numbers into the context of other catastrophes helps to understand the devastation to Ireland in particular. The Great Hunger of 1845–1852 resulted in a loss of 16% of the population, while during the Second World War the population of the Soviet Union fell by 16%. Above; the family crescent of another famous Black Clan in Scotland, UK, called Douglas.

The Black man on the right has disappeared from the modern crests. He would have been referred to as a wild Indian savage at that time. And below; one of the many modern family crest of the Douglas family. Note: Both the Black man and White man standing proudly by his side has vanished again.

One of the many modern family crest of the Douglas family

The English Interregnum was the period of parliamentary and military rule by the Lord Protector Oliver Cromwell under the Commonwealth of England after the English Civil War. It began with the overthrow, and execution, of Charles I in January 1649, and ended with the restoration of Charles II on May 29, 1660.

Whence the (‘Black Irish” of Jamaica? JOSEPH J. WILLIAMS, S.J., Ph.D., Litt. D., F.R.S.A., F.R.G.S., F.A.G.S. ($2.00, New York: Dial Press, 1932.)

Five years residence in Jamaica impressed Father Williams with the fact that the Jamaica Negroes were unlike all other Negro types that he had seen. Particularly among those of Gold Coast origin he found claims and remnants of Judaism. His resultant studies led to his Hebrewisms of West Africa (1930). But another outstanding fact was the large number of Negroes with pure Irish names.

These negroes could not be explained as descendants of slaves owned by early Irish colonists, for no such names appear among the land-owners in the survey of 1670.

John Stewart Earl of Traquir

So Father Williams turns to English records of the crushing of the Irish, by Cromwell, with consequent deportations of large numbers of Irish as bondmen or bond-maids to the West Indies-especially Barbados, where such names as Cavan, Collins, Connolly, Donovan, Duffey, Dunn, Grogan, Kelly, McCann, McSwiney, McDermott, Moriarity, O’Brien, O’Neal, O’Halloran, Walsh, abound in the old cemeteries.

Father Williams gives pictures of Jamaica negro children named Collins, Walsh, McKeon, McDermott, Burke, Mackey, McCormack, Kennedy. His bibliography on the deportations and barbarities includes 175 sources. Beyond this his 100-page monograph does not go.

Excerpts:
JAMAICA - ARRIVAL 1600S: The Irish arrived in Jamaica over 350 years ago in the mid-1600s at the time of British Lord Protector Oliver Cromwell's capture of Jamaica. When British Admirals Penn and Venables failed in their expedition to take Santo Domingo from the Spanish, they turned their attention to Jamaica, not wanting to return to Cromwell empty-handed.

With reinforcements from British-held Barbados (many of whom were Irish) they made quick work of dispatching the weak Spanish defence and soon realized that they needed workers to support their new prize. They looked eastward to islands already under British control, Barbados, St. Lucia, St. Kitts and Montserrat, and imported young, mainly male, bonded servants, many of whom were Irish.

In 1641 Ireland's population stood close to 1.5 million. Following a 1648 battle in Ireland known as the "Siege of Drogheda" in which Irish rebels were brutally subdued, Oliver's son, Henry, was named Major General in command of English forces in Ireland.

Estonian Negroid, White skin Blond hair

Under his jurisdiction, thousands of Irish men and women were shipped to the West Indies to provide a source of indentured labour. Between 1648 and 1655, over 12,000 political prisoners alone were sent to Barbados. This was the first set to come involuntarily as prior to that the Irish had willingly chosen to subject themselves to terms of indenture for the chance to start a new life in the New World upon completion of their contracts.

By 1652, Ireland's population had dwindled to a little over half a million famine, rebellion and forced deportation, all factors.Throughout the early years of the 1650s there was a push to send young men and women to the colonies in what the English believed was a "measure beneficial to the people removed, who might thus be made English and Christians.

And a great benefit to the West India sugar planters, who desired the men and boys for their bondsmen, and the women and Irish girls in a country where they had only Maroon women and Negresses to solace them" (Williams, 1932, pp. 10-11). The 13-year war from 1641-1654 had left behind large numbers of widows and deserted wives.

In addition, many Irish men, their properties confiscated by Cromwell had no means of making a living. By 1655 some 6,400 Irish had been shipped off when in March all orders to capture "all wanderers, men and women and other such Irish in their possession" were revoked (Williams, pp. 12-13). Modern-day Estonian Negroid, White skin, Blond hair, could some of the many of the Black Irish and Scots looked like this male or female?

End of part 6 of 7. The next blog 14/01/19: First arrival of the indentured Black Irish and Scots in the Caribbean and America., especially Jamaica and Barbados.

Black, Hebrides, Scotland, Samuel Johnson, Scottish, Isle

The Journal of a tour to the Hebrides, 1773 AD

What lessons have we learned so far from delving into Black history researches that are based on falsified Caucasian narratives?

Let us expand further, by forensically using History, Philosophy, Psychology, Mentalism, and Logic, we have been able logically to solve the problem of truthfulness in researches, by logically and accurately working out the percentages of the probabilities of  truthfulness or falsehood, in individual Supposition, Scenario and article.

In part 1 of these articles, we introduced Thomas Cromwell via an article stating: It was Thomas Cromwell who destroyed all pieces of evidence of Black Rule in Britain? Article from the Daily Telegraph Media Group Limited Jan 2015.

Main Quote: No one can be sure of the exact figure, but it is estimated that the destruction started and legalised by Cromwell amounted to 97% of the English art then in existence.  Followed by: The British Library, which is full of thousands upon thousands of Illuminated Manuscripts, that looks very old and then posed the question that, if Thomas Cromwell destroyed 97% of Britain's artefacts, then most of those manuscripts are FAKE because they are almost completely devoid of Black people.

In addition, we displayed more realistic images and summaries of king Henry VIII, Queen Mary I, Queen Elizabeth I, Nenet boy, Anne Boleyn, and Majory mother of King Robert II of Scotland, the founder of the House of Stuart. In part 2 of these articles: We stated that nine Stewart monarchs ruled just Scotland from 1371 until 1603 and that after this there was a Union of the Crowns under James VI & I who had become the senior genealogical claimant to all of the holdings of the extinct House of Tudor. Followed by summarising and showing more realistic images of  King James VI & I, Mary Queen of Scots, Lord Stuart Darnley, John Erskine, Charles I and Henrietta Marie.

Dr Samuel Johnson

In part 3 of these articles: we displayed a more realistic image of Charles Stuart I. We also define the word "Swarthy" and applied the meaning of the description as written by the author Alison Weir, in relation to the ethnicity of Queen Elizabeth I and King Henry VIII.

Then summaries plus realistic and misleading images of Charles Stuart II, including the accurate description of his ethnicity by his mother,  Henrietta Marie. Followed by real-life event used in the "First Scenario" example of demonstrating the effects of the real-life event, pertaining to the status and ethnicity of Charles Stuart II and the nickname Black Boy, in which confusion reign supreme.

His status and ethnicity were portrayed from a Caucasian-looking king to Black Chimney sweeper, Black Sailor, Soldier, even a Black horse, and finally, he vanishes like noodle.

In part 4 of these articles: we displayed a more realistic and falsified image of James Francis Edward Stuart III, including summaries. We also confirmed the status and ethnicity of James Francis Edward Stuart III, while exposing modern French propaganda muddling his status.

Followed by real-life event used in the "Second Scenario part a and b", examples of demonstrating the effects of the real-life event, pertaining to the status and ethnicity of James Francis Edward Stuart and King George III, in which we debunked the denial of the authenticity, of the Barbados penny and confirm the identity of James Francis Edward Stuart III. Plus documented arguments  about"The myth of Scottish slaves in the Caribbean," or "The reality of Scottish slaves in the Caribbean," in the public domain, in which confusion reign supreme as usual, via blissfully falsified narratives. And now we are about to introduce you to Eyewitnesses Accounts about the Status and ethnicity of the people living in the Hebrides, Northern Scotland, UK, around 16 and 1700 AD.

Isle of Jura, Scotland

WARNING: The Journal of a tour to the Hebrides, with Samuel Johnson. By James Boswell 1810 edition (It should be noted that apparently all versions after 1810 and the “Project Gutenberg” version, have all references to Blacks deleted, so care should be taken in which version you buy or use.)

Dr. Samuel Johnson was also the Author of the English Dictionary with the aid of his manservant Frank Berber, a Black man.

Page 64: Gory, my lord's black servant, was sent as our guide, to conduct us to the high road. The circumstance of each of them having a black servant was another point of similarity between Johnson and Monboddo. I observed how curious it was to see an African in the north of Scotland, with little or no difference of manners from those of the natives. Dr. Johnson laughed to see Gory and Joseph riding together most cordially.

"Those two fellows, (said he,) one from Africa, the other from Bohemia, seem quite at home." Bohemia = Czech Republic with its capital in Prague. Ancient Black Celts land before the Caucasian Slav invasion from Central Asia.

Isle of Colonsay, Scotland

Page 121: We came to a rich green valley, comparatively speaking, and stopped a while to let our horses rest and eat grass. We soon afterward came to Auchnasheal, a kind of rural village, a number of cottages being built together, as we saw all along in the Highlands.

We passed many miles this day without seeing a house, but only little summer-huts called shillings. Evan Campbell, servant to Mr. Murchison, fastor to the Laird of Macleod in Glenelg, ran along with us today. He was a very obliging fellow. At Auchnasheal, we sat down on a green turf-seat at the end of a house; they brought us out two wooden dishes of milk, which we tasted. One of them was frothed like a syllabub. Honour

Page 122: We had a considerable circle about us, men, women and children, all M'Craas, (Macraes) Lord Seaforth's people. Not one of them could speak English. I observed to Dr. Johnson, it was much the same as being with a tribe of Indians. — Johnson, " Yes, sir; but not so terrifying."

I gave all who chose it, snuff and tobacco. Governor Trapaud had made us buy a quantity at Fort Augustus, and put them up in small parcels.

 Isle of Gigha, Scotland

I also gave each person a bit of wheat bread, which they had never tasted before. I then gave a penny apiece to each child.

I told Dr. Johnson of this; upon which he called to Joseph and our guides, for change for a shilling, and declared that he would distribute among the children. Upon this being announced in Erse (Scottish Gaelic), there was a great stir.

Page 123: There was great diversity in the faces of the circle around us: Some were as black and wild in their appearance as any American savages whatever. One woman was as comely almost as the figure of Sappho, as we see it painted.

From the Appin Regiment/Appin Historical Society: A Description of THE WESTERN ISLANDS of Scotland (CIRCA 1695) By Martin Martin, Gent. Including A Voyage to St. Kilda By the same author and A Description Of THE WESTERN ISLES Of Scotland By Sir Donald Monro. Edited with Introduction by Donald J. Macleod, O.B.E., M.A., D. Litt., Officer d'Académie Foreword:

Isle of Skye, Scotland

The Complexion of the Islanders of the Isle of Jura: The natives here are very well proportioned, being generally black of complexion and free from bodily imperfections. They speak the Irish language, and wear the plaid, bonnet, etc., as other islanders.

The Complexion of the Islanders of the Isle of Colonsay: The inhabitants are generally well proportioned, and of a black complexion; they speak only the Irish tongue, and use the habit, diet etc., that is used in the Western Isles: They are all Protestants, and observe the festivals of Christmas, Easter, and Good Friday; but the women-only observe the festival of the nativity of the Blessed Virgin. Kilouran is the principal church in this isle, and the village in which this church is, hath its name from it.

The Complexion of the Islanders of the Isle of Gigha:The inhabitants are all Protestants, and speak the Irish tongue generally, there being but few that speak English; they are grave and reserved in their conversation; they are accustomed not to bury on Friday; they are fair or brown in complexion, and use the same habit, diet, etc., that is made use of in the adjacent continent and isles. There is only one inn in this isle.

Isle of Arran, Scotland

The Complexion of the Islanders of the Isle of Skye: The inhabitants of this isle are generally well proportioned, and their complexion is for the most part black. They are not obliged to art in forming their bodies, for nature never fails to act her part bountifully to them; and perhaps there is no part of the habitable globe where so few bodily imperfections are to be seen, nor any children that go more early.

I have observed several of them walk alone before they were ten months old; they are bathed all over every morning and evening, some in cold, some in warm water, but the latter is most commonly used and they wear nothing straight about them.

A page from Bleu's map of Lewis and Harris, Scotland 1654 AD.

The mother generally suckles the child, failing of which a nurse is provided, for they seldom bring up any by hand; they give new-born infants fresh butter to take away the miconium, and this they do for several days; they taste neither sugar, nor cinnamon, nor have they any daily allowance of sack bestowed on them, as the custom is elsewhere, nor is the nurse allowed to taste ale.

On the north-west side of Strath lies that part of Skye called Macleod’s Country, possessed by Macleod. Genealogists say he is lineally descended from Leod, son to the Black Prince of Man. He is head of an ancient tribe.

 Bleu's map of Lewis and Harris, Scotland 1654 AD

The Complexion of the Islanders of the Isle of Arran: The inhabitants of this island are composed of several tribes. The most ancient family among them is by the natives reckoned to be MacLouis, which in the ancient language signifies the son of Lewis.

They own themselves to be descended of French parentage. Their surname in English is Fullerton, and their title Kirk-Mitchell, the place of their residence. If tradition be true, this little family is said to be of 700 years standing.

The present possessor obliged me with the sight of his old and new charters, by which he is one of the king’s coroners within this island, and as such he hath a halbert peculiar to his office. He has his right of late from the family of Hamilton, wherein his title and perquisites of the coroner are confirmed to him and his heirs.

He is obliged to have three men to attend him upon all public emergencies, and he is bound by his office to pursue all malefactors and to deliver them to the steward, or in his absence to the next judge.

Map of Isle of Lewis and Harris, modern-day Scotland, UK

And if any of the inhabitants refuse to pay their rents at the usual term, the coroner is bound to take him personally or to seize his goods.

And if it should happen that the coroner with his retinue of three men is not sufficient to put his office in execution, then he summons all the inhabitants to concur with him; and immediately they rendezvous to the place, where he fixes his coroner’s staff.

The perquisites due to the coroner are a firelet or bushel of oats and a lamb from every village in the Isle, both which are punctually paid him at the ordinary terms.

The inhabitants of this isle are well proportioned, generally brown, and some of a black complexion. They enjoy a good state of health and have a genius for all callings or employment, though they have but few mechanics. They wear the same habit with those of the nearest Isles and are very civil. They all speak the Irish language, yet the English tongue prevails on the east side, and ordinarily, the ministers preach in it, and in Irish on the west side. Their ordinary asseveration is by Nale, for I did not hear any oath in the island.

The Pygmies Isle (Recovered bones of Pygmies): The Pygmies Isle or Luchraban (Martin's 'Lusbirdan') near the Butt of Lewis. It is also located on most of the early maps, such a Bleu's map of Lewis and Harris (1654), as 'Ylen Dunibeg', Eilean nan Daoine Beaga - the Island of the Little People. The English poet Collins, in an Ode of 1749, refers to the 'Herbid Isle... in whose small vaults a pygmy folk is found'. This assertion was also confirmed in "Journal of the Royal Institution of Cornwall 1907 AD", Footprint of Vanished Races in Cornwall:

Page 282, second paragraph: "Cornwall, then, was in the early days of the Neolithic age, inhabited by a race of pygmies, like the Bushmen of South Africa, and whom for convenience, I shall call the Piskey-Dwarfs." Page 282, third paragraph: M. De Mortillet figured out their "diminutive half-an-inch arrow-heads," were found in France, Kitchen-midden, Hastings, England, and Rev. Reginald Gatty found large numbers of them in Yorkshire, England, including Germany and Poland.

End of part 5 of 7. The next blog 08/01/19: Black Irish indentures in Jamaica, USA, Barbados and the rest of the Caribbean.

James II & VII, James Francis Edward Stuart, House of Stuart

Date of the "Thirty years war" and German Genocide of Blacks (1618–1648)
Dates of the British civil wars and British Genocide of Blacks (1639 - 1652), (1689), (1715 - 1745):

Portrait of a Caucasian looking James II & VII

James II & VII, House of Stuart, (14 October 1633O.S. – 16 September 1701) was King of England and King of Ireland as James II and King of Scots as James VII, from 6 February 1685. He was the last Catholic monarch to reign over the Kingdoms of England, Scotland, and Ireland.

Members of Britain's political and religious elite increasingly opposed him for being pro-French and pro-Catholic, and for his designs on becoming an absolute monarch.

When he produced a Catholic heir, the tension exploded, and leading nobles called on William III of Orange (his son-in-law and nephew) to land an invasion army from the Netherlands, which he did.

James fled England (and thus was held to have abdicated) in the Glorious Revolution of 1688. He was replaced by William of Orange who became king as William III, ruling jointly with his wife (James's daughter) Mary II.

The Glorious Revolution also called the Revolution of 1688, is the overthrow of King James II of England (James VII of Scotland and James II of Ireland) by a union of English Parliamentarians with the Dutch stadtholder William III of Orange-Nassau (William of Orange). William's successful invasion of England with a Dutch fleet and army led to his ascending the English throne as William III of England jointly with his wife Mary II of England.

James Francis Edward Stuart son of  James II - CONFIRMED!

Thus William and Mary, both Protestants, became joint rulers in 1689. James made one serious attempt to recover his crowns when he landed in Ireland in 1689 but, after the defeat of the Jacobite forces by the Williamite forces at the Battle of the Boyne in the summer of 1690, James returned to France.

He lived out the rest of his life as a pretender at a court sponsored by his cousin and ally, King Louis XIV.

The Jacobite Wars - No accurate estimate of causalities: The Jacobite Risings were a series of uprisings, rebellions, and wars in Great Britain and Ireland occurring between 1688 and 1746.

The uprisings were aimed at returning James VII of Scotland and II of England, and later his descendants of the House of Stuart, to the throne after he was deposed by Parliament during the Glorious Revolution. The series of conflicts takes its name from Jacobus, the Latin form of James.

The major Jacobite Risings were called the Jacobite Rebellions by the ruling governments. The "First Jacobite Rebellion" and "Second Jacobite Rebellion" were known respectively as "The Fifteen" and "The Forty-Five", after the years in which they occurred (1715 and 1745).

Although each Jacobite rising had unique features, they were part of a larger series of military campaigns by Jacobites attempting to restore the Stuart kings to the thrones of Scotland and England (and after 1707, Great Britain). James was deposed in 1688 and the thrones were claimed by his daughter Mary II jointly with her husband, the Dutch-born William of Orange.

After the House of Hanover succeeded to the British throne in 1714, the risings continued and intensified. They continued until the last Jacobite Rebellion ("the Forty-Five"), led by Charles Edward Stuart (the Young Pretender), who was soundly defeated at the Battle of Culloden in 1746. This ended any realistic hope of a Stuart restoration.

French Propaganda about James Francis Edward Stuart III

James Francis Edward Stuart - CONFIRMED! James Francis Edward, Prince of Wales (the Chevalier de St George, "The King Over the Water", "The Old Pretender" or "The Old Chevalier"; (1688–1766) was the son of the deposed James II of England and Ireland (James VII of Scotland). As such, he claimed the English, Scottish and Irish thrones (as James III of England and Ireland and James VIII of Scotland) from the death of his father in 1701, when he was recognised as the king of England, Scotland and Ireland by his cousin Louis XIV of France.

Obviously, the Black Scottish people were incredibly loyal to their legitimate Black kings. Thus while their kings were in exile, there was a great yearning for pictures of them. Troy and his assistants serviced this need with unknown quantities of portraits of them.

Even though many people took part in painting those portraits, they would all have looked as much alike as humanly possible, with regards to the person's features, though backgrounds and clothing could change. This portrait, like the Holy Roman Empire Emperor Charles V portrait, was likely hidden away, and thus escaped whitewashed Caucasian type destruction with the rest. The White man as James below, may, or may not be a real person. In any case, it is part of the conspiracy of the Caucasian type narratives to create fake artefacts to replace the real ones, in support of the fake history the Caucasian have created to explain their position of rule.

Fake James Francis Edward Stuart III

Following his death in 1766, he was succeeded by his son Charles Edward Stuart in the Jacobite Succession. Had his father not been deposed, there would have been only two monarchs during his lifetime; his father and himself. In reality, there were seven; his father, William III, Mary II, Anne, George I, George II and George III.

Although the ruling Protestant Stuarts died out with his half-sister, Queen Anne, the last remaining Stuarts were James and his sons, and their endeavours to reclaim the throne while remaining devoted to their Catholic faith are remembered in history as Jacobitism.

Most Truths is "half-false" and most Falsehoods is "half-truth". These statements are ambiguous, unspecific and neither here nor there, at first without dissembling them any further.

However, we will prove beyond any reasonable doubt that these statements can be concise, precise, specific, unambiguous and accurate in certain suppositions. For example, the argument between authors and general members of the public pertaining to "The myth of Scottish slaves in the Caribbean", or "The reality of Scottish slaves in the Caribbean". However, both titles are "half-false" and "half-true".

These authors are both spectacularly wrong in relation to indentured Black Scots (not slaves), Black Scots and Black Scottish aristocrats. They assumed just because they are unaware of black people who had been living in Scotland for thousands of years before them, they physically did not exist.

It is quite frightening how little all these authors, as well the general public knew about Scottish black history. In a bite-size and piece by piece, we will expose this lack of knowledge via their argument, which is useful to them in their assertions but totally misrepresented in ours. Second Scenario part a:

The Barbados Penny, Depicting Negro Looking King George III, House of Hanover 

Even more so, the Caucasian type narrative has created fake portraits and statues of their Black Kings, depicting them falsely as Caucasians. But sometimes, innocuous-seeming remnants survived and were overlooked. When they are discovered, the Caucasian type narrative concocted outrageously stupid scenarios to explain their existence. Such is the case with the Barbados Penny:

The Caucasian type historians want us to believe that they would continually mint coins with the head of one of their chattel Slaves, in Kingly fashion, wearing the sacred symbol of the British Empire and People, the British crown, and later deny these coins authenticity by citing forgery. Which self-respecting forger, past or present, would forge coins and in getting the racial identity spectacularly wrong, hopes to prosper, from such a terrible forgery? The very same Slaves who when they were not brutalising or killing them, they worried that the Slaves would kill them.

The Regal Circlet Crown of Queen Victoria 1819 - 1901 AD

And the most Alarming and Disturbing things about the image of Caucasian looking James Francis Edward Stuart III and James II is that they would be the portrait hanging on 99% of the Schools, Colleges, and Universities around the world now. It is another case of the 6 Ds, Deceitful, Deceptive, Dishonest, Dis-informative, Dumb and Dubious, including the propaganda of portraying him as a mere Painter by the French.

King George III, Mulatto looking

Let us not forget that Caucasian type narratives have also claimed to be Egyptians and Persians, as well as other original people, in environments where a Caucasian in the native clothing could not survive the Sun.

Just like they came up with a fake explanation for their Whiteness - Vitamin D, Balderdash and Piffle!

Second Scenario part b: The White Slaves narrative: The myth of Scottish slaves in the Caribbean is a sub-set of a narrative more commonly associated with the Irish in colonial America.

It has been underpinned by two polemical books: Theodore W. Allen’s The Invention of the White Race and more recently, Don Jordan and Michael Walsh’s White Cargo: The Forgotten History of Britain’s White Slaves in America. The authors were not professional historians. Allen was a writer and activist.

Jordan is a television director and Walsh a journalist, which perhaps explains the sensationalist interpretations of White Cargo.

The American historian Michael Guasco recently suggested the text should be read in ‘conjunction with more analytical and thoroughly contextualised works’ – a diplomatic way of urging caution when considering the authors’ conclusions. So, I had a look. Chapter sixteen concerns the Jacobites forcibly transported from Scotland after the uprisings in 1715 and 1746 who, according to the authors, were sometimes enslaved: those sent to the Caribbean were treated worse than those sent to America.

Whitened Bonnie Prince Charlie or the Young Pretender,

Son of James Francis Edward Stuart III, the Old Pretender.

There is no question that Jacobites were harshly dealt within what was a concerted attack on the Highland way of life – but they were never regarded or treated as chattel slaves.

Ironically, the White Cargo bibliography includes two books written by the late Anglo-Canadian journalist, John Prebble. According to Tom Devine, it is difficult to differentiate in Prebble’s work what was ‘based on reasonable research and what was the product of the imagination’.

Prebble’s ‘victim histories’ of Scotland (Glencoe, Culloden, The Highland Clearances and Darien) sold in huge numbers from the 1960s onward; exemplars of the Scottish school of pseudo-historio-graphical victimology. -Modern academics have added more nuance.

 For example, Darien (1698-1700) was indeed a disaster for Scotland and deliberate lack of support from the English in the Caribbean contributed to the death of many Scots. Whilst the slant of Prebble’s books defined a generation of victim-hood, popular histories have been replaced by online blogs. Elizabeth McQuillan’s:  ‘The hidden Scots victims of the slave trade’ in the Caledonian Mercury is completely devoid of any relevant historical evidence or analysis. Incredibly, after repeating the ‘white slaves myth’, the article suggests that ‘pressure groups [in Scotland] were looking for an official apology’ as their ancestors were white slaves.

Fake Painting about the Jacobite war

But let’s not forget the poorly planned venture represented a failed attempt at Scottish colonisation. Indeed, one scheme proposed by the Duke of Hamilton at Darien sought to import slaves to be worked to death in the gold mines of Panama.

This was not some romantic quest to establish a new society based upon Utopian socialist principles. It was a mercantilist venture designed to improve personal fortunes and Scotland’s balance of trade through colonisation and exploitation.

It seems almost embarrassing that the article ends with Robert Burns’s The Slaves Lament which concerns the African slave trade from Senegal to Virginia (a song he almost certainly didn’t author, according to Glasgow University experts. However, he nearly made a trip to Jamaica as a slave plantation overseer in 1786). Above: Fake Whitened painting depicting a scene from one of the Jacobite War.

This type of historical blog enters an echo-chamber of misinformation cited as credible sources, sometimes in response to articles about migration or the Scottish role in slavery. The ‘white slaves myth’, based upon weak foundations flourishes in the unchecked environment of the Internet. For those familiar with Hogan’s Law, this is nothing new.

A Whitened Painting of a Jacobite Royal Family, note the black boy depicted in the background

Liam Hogan has written articles on the myth of the Irish slaves, a myth which has been hijacked in America by right-wing groups and white supremacists to deflect from the legacy of black racialised chattel slavery and the ongoing quest for reparations in America. The Scottish white slaves strand differs from the Irish version in one important way. Whilst the Irish slaves myth has been used to cultivate white victimhood in America, the Scottish version is used mainly to deflect from the wider historical narrative of Scots involvement with British imperialism and specifically Caribbean slavery.

It wisnae us – white Scots were slaves first. It wisnae us – it was English. It wisnae us – it was the rich landowners. It wisnae us – the working classes weren’t involved. It wisnae us – it happened 200 years ago. Repeat ad nauseum. The end of the arguments they are having among themselves. Above: A Whitened Painting of a Jacobite Royal Family, note the black boy depicted in the background.

These aristocrats in England and Europe must really love young male Negro boys. Their explanation for this young male Negro boy in the painting, as a servant or a slave. at least they are consistent with their lies lol. End of part 4 of 7. The next blog 04/01/19: The Status and Ethnicity of the People of the Hebrides, Northern-Scotland, UK, and Black Indentures.

Charles Stuart II, House of Stuart, The Black Boy, Inn, Pubs

Charles II, House of Stuart, (29 May 1630 – 6 February 1685)

After the death of Cromwell in 1658, Charles's chances of regaining the Crown at first seemed slim as Cromwell was succeeded as Lord Protector by his son, Richard.

Charles I, House of Stuart, father of Charles II

However, the new Lord Protector, with no power base in either Parliament or the New Model Army, was forced to abdicate in 1659 and the Protectorate was abolished. During the civil and military unrest which followed, George Monck, the Governor of Scotland, was concerned that the nation would descend into anarchy.

Monck and his army marched into the City of London and forced the Rump Parliament to re-admit members of the Long Parliament excluded in December 1648 during Pride's Purge.

The Long Parliament dissolved itself and for the first time in almost 20 years, there was a general election. The outgoing Parliament designed the electoral qualifications so as to ensure, as they thought, the return of a Presbyterian majority. The restrictions against royalist candidates and voters were widely ignored, and the elections resulted in a House of Commons which was fairly evenly divided on political grounds between Royalists and Parliamentarians and on religious grounds between Anglicans and Presbyterians.

The new so-called Convention Parliament assembled on 25 April 1660, and soon afterward received news of the Declaration of Breda, in which Charles agreed, amongst other things, to pardon many of his father's enemies. The English Parliament resolved to proclaim Charles king and invite him to return, a message that reached Charles at Breda on 8 May 1660.

A Caucasian type portrait of Charles II

In Ireland, a convention had been called earlier in the year, and on 14 May it declared for Charles II as King. Charles II, who dated his accession from the death of his father, did not take up the reins of government until the restoration of the monarchy in 1660. After 1660, all legal documents were dated as if Charles had succeeded his father as king in 1649.

In that same year, Charles I was canonised as Saint Charles Stuart and King Charles the Martyr by the Church of England and is venerated throughout the Anglican Communion. Charles's English parliament enacted laws known as the Clarendon Code, designed to shore up the position of the re-established Church of England. Charles acquiesced to the Clarendon Code even though he himself favoured a policy of religious tolerance.

The major foreign policy issue of Charles's early reign was the Second Anglo-Dutch War. In 1670, Charles entered into the secret treaty of Dover, an alliance with his first cousin King Louis XIV of France. Louis agreed to aid Charles in the Third Anglo-Dutch War and pay Charles a pension, and Charles secretly promised to convert to Roman Catholicism at an unspecified future date. Charles attempted to introduce religious freedom for Catholics and Protestant dissenters with his 1672 Royal Declaration of Indulgence, but the English Parliament forced him to withdraw it.

In 1679, Titus Oates's revelations of a supposed "Popish Plot" sparked the Exclusion Crisis when it was revealed that Charles's brother and heir (James, Duke of York) was a Roman Catholic. The crisis saw the birth of the pro-exclusion Whig and anti-exclusion Tory parties. Charles sided with the Tories, and, following the discovery of the Rye House Plot to murder Charles and James in 1683, some Whig leaders were killed or forced into exile.

Charles II, House of Stuart, The Black Boy

Charles dissolved the English Parliament in 1681 and ruled alone until his death on 6 February 1685.

He was received into the Roman Catholic Church on his deathbed. Charles was popularly known as the Merrie Monarch, in reference to both the liveliness and hedonism of his court and the general relief at the return to normality after over a decade of rule by Oliver Cromwell and the Puritans.

Charles's wife, Catherine of Braganza, bore no children, but Charles acknowledged at least 12 illegitimate children by various mistresses.

As illegitimate children were excluded from the succession, he was succeeded by his brother James. Note; in reading these excerpts from the book, please ignore the obvious Albino nonsense, and the obviously bogus Whitened portrait, and stay with the facts. Quote:

First of all, he had abnormal darkness of complexion, a truly saturnine tint. This darkness was the subject of comment from first. His mother wrote jokingly to her sister-in-law that she had given birth to a black baby and to a friend in France that 'he was so dark that she was ashamed of him'. She would send his portrait 'as soon as he is a little fairer'. But Charles never did become fairer. Later the sobriquet 'the Black Boy' would be used, still commemorated in English Inn/Pubs signs.

There was even a 'fanatic' fantasy at the time of the Popish Plot in the 1670s, that Charles had been fathered on Henrietta Maria (see her image below), by a 'black Scotsman' - a neat combination of the two prejudices of the time, against the Catholics and the Scots. So it became convenient to refer to the then King as that 'black Bastard'.

Henrietta Maria/Marie, mother of Charles II

Most Truths are "half-false" and most Falsehoods are "half-truth". These statements are ambiguous, unspecific and neither here nor there, at first without dissembling them any further. It is the fourth Natural law relating to Polarity. However, we will prove beyond any reasonable doubt that these statements can be concise, precise, specific, unambiguous and accurate in certain suppositions.

For example, the argument between a Pub (Public House, an Inn) and general members of the public pertaining to The Black Boy Symbol displayed in front of their Pubs, Inns, Hotels or Bread and Breakfast facilities. "Are they Racist Symbols, or Genuine Tradition in celebrating English history?" However, this is a good example scenario to demonstrate the law of Polarity in action. Both Questions are "half-false" and "half-true".

These pubs (Public House, an Inn), Hotels and Guesthouses and general members of the public are both spectacularly wrong in relation as to the truth behind Black Boy Charles Stuart II and The Black Boy Symbol. Those that knew about  Charles Stuart II historicity assumed that he was a Caucasian monarch and blissfully unaware of the Black king narratives because they had been taught in Schools, Colleges and Universities, including the mainstream media otherwise, incorporating Black and White people alike.

Those that wanted the sign to remain stating Historical importance of such symbols and those that wanted it to be taking down sighting Racism, both based their reasons on Misinformed historicity of Black history in Europe. There are two different instances of these real-life scenarios that will display the blissful ignorance of the general public and the mainstream media, graphically and contextually.

The Black Boy, King Charles II, right King wrong Colour

First Scenario: Telegraph Reporters 21 JANUARY 2017 4:00PM
A pub firm has backed down on its mission to rename a pub called The Black Boy after locals complained. Barons Pub Company took over the 500-year-old inn at Shinfield, near Reading, this week and suggested changing its name to the more politically correct Shinfield Arms.

They said there had been “negative comments” over the Black Boy name. But following the announcement, 250 people went on social media to protest about the change.

The firm said they suggested the idea of changing the pub’s name because ‘The Black Boy’ was “causing concern”. A spokesman said: “We are always respectful of the history of pubs and understand that changing the name of a pub is not a decision to be taken lightly.

“However in our short association with the pub, we have been surprised by how many negative reactions we have had to the name The Black Boy. We are proposing to change the name to The Shinfield Arms and would like to hear the views of anyone who lives in the area or anyone who has an opinion on this subject.”

After hundreds of comments from customers urging the pub to keep its historical name, the pub said today it wouldn’t change it. The company said: “What a fantastic response from everyone. Thanks so much for all your comments, your passion, and enthusiasm - you’ve made the decision really easy.”

The Black Boy, a Drummer Boy in the Army

One social media user said: “It's not offensive. It's a historic name that refers back to the English civil war.” The pub’s website says there are “many interesting theories” as to how the Inn acquired its “unusual” name. It says: “As the pub was around during the reign of Charles II, it is supposed that it and other Black Boy pubs around the country were named after the king, who was renowned partly for his swarthy complexion. “Alternatively, many believe that the name comes from a famous dark figurine smoking a pipe that once adorned the doorway."

The Black Boy, now a Chimney Sweeper

In a bite-size and piece by piece, we will expose this lack of knowledge via their argument, which is useful to them in their assertions but totally misrepresented in ours. By presenting our evidence in a legal format.

1.  An eye witness account as evidence is first among equals and second to none in comparison to Hearsay, Rumour, Gossips, Assertions, Assumptions, Presumptions, Speculations, and Suppositions. 2.  An eye witness account that is supported by images albeit contrasting, is even more powerful in the court of law.

Starting by the definition of the word "Swarthy", as to ascertain its meaning. "The word Stuart comes from the old Nordish root Svart which means black. Stuart is the same word as Swarthy, which means black in old English."

Svart, Stuart, Stewart, Swart or Swarthy. According to Alison Weir in her book: Pertaining to Elizabeth I - She has a swarthy, "Olive" complexion like that of mother, although she made a habit of Whitening it with a lotion made up of egg-whites, powdered eggshell, poppy seeds, borax, and alum, which made her face appear White and luminous. From her father, she had her red naturally curly hair.  Let us examine the statement about Whitening her face, including having a complexion like that of her father.

 If Elizabeth I was a pale skin Caucasian as they claimed, she has no need to go to such an extraordinary length to Whitened her face. This also applies to Elizabeth I father (Henry VIII) because they have similar skin complexion, therefore both father and daughter must be at least a Mulatto (Mixed Race). Well, the fact is that Olives are Green or Black, no Humans have Green Skin.

The Black Boy, as a Sailor

According to Henrietta Marie mother of Charles II in her own word in a letter to her sister-in-law: First of all, he had abnormal darkness of complexion, a truly saturnine tint. This darkness was the subject of comment from first.

His mother wrote jokingly to her sister-in-law that she had given birth to a black baby and to a friend in France that 'he was so dark that she was ashamed of him'. She would send his portrait 'as soon as he is a little fairer'. This is an eye witness account supported by the images of the true king Charles II and a Falsified one.

It is quite frightening how little all these Authors, Bloggers, Graduates, Teachers, Professors, Politicians, and the General Public knew about Black Boy Charles Stuart II. Even more so, the Caucasian type narrative has created fake portraits and statues of their Black Kings, depicting them falsely as Caucasians. But sometimes, innocuous-seeming remnants survived and were overlooked.

Finally due, these general campaigns and promotion of the falsified history of Black people in Europe as Slaves, Servants, Beggars, being-Kidnapped or the Prince even the king of Congo. As a direct result of all these misinformation: King Charles II, the Black Boy has been depicted as different things by different Inn-keepers.

The Black Boy depicted as a Black Horse

They first depicted him correctly as King Charles II, but Caucasian type. The second one depicted him as a Drummer in the Army, the third one depicted him as a Chimney-sweeper, the fourth depicted him as a Sailor, the fifth depicted him as a Black Horse and the last one in Oxford, England, has no Symbol at all due to political correctness that has gone mad or Protests.

The same Oxford City that has no Black community Centre while every other major city in the UK has them. What a joke, but it is not funny at all. It is only Birmingham University, in Birmingham England, UK, that facilitates Black history as a course, in its own right, in the whole of Europe.

The Black Boy, Oxford City, England, UK, No Symbol at all

And the facilitation of this course only commences at Birmingham University a couple of years ago.

The irony is that there are plenty of American Universities, specifically the USA, that has been and still facilitating Black history as a course, in its own right and still remain the most racist country on the planet.

In addition, due to falsified history being taught to us in Schools, Colleges, Universities, including Books, Social-Media or regurgitated via the Main-Stream-Media, we unconsciously set in motion the powerful force of Cause and Effect, no 6 out of 8 Natural Laws, called The Principle of Cause and Effect. And subconsciously set in motion The Principle of CARE, the encapsulating principle of the other principles, to Cause an Effect that Erases another evidence of Black history from European type narratives.

Anne Boleyn, mother of Elizabeth I

This is tantamount to a comedy of ironies based of false narratives in which we subconsciously unleashed the oculist forces of the 6th and 8th natural law, via wrong assumptions and presumptions as a causation to change the effect we perceived to feel, in our perception of history, Black and White alike, into a positive effect that which we considered negative. For example:

Those that wanted the signs taken down due to the perceived racist symbol it represent and those that wanted it to stay up believing he was a Caucasian king are both wrongs in their assertions.

Be careful what you CARE about because` unwittingly scenario 1 incorporates the 4th, 6th, and 8th Natural law, being subconsciously invoked, by the general public, Black and White alike, to cause and effect a favourable effect.

By considering and picking one side of the argument (Conceiving), by caring enough about the subject matter, and going into planning mode with others on social media or physically (Conceiving Care), and by actually executing a social media or physical campaign (CARE Action). Finally the innkeeper's decision as to Nay or Ye, a positive or negative manifestation of Action via CARE. This is the same occult principles that the elite has always utilised to rule and control us for thousands of years but consciously.

Therefore, let all these debunking tunes your mind away from the frequency of falsehood. The end of part 3 of 7. I rest my case in relation to Black Boy Charles Stuart II, First Scenario. Next blog 01/01/19. Debunking the Barbados Penny and James Edward Stuart III, including presenting the Second Scenario.