James II & VII, James Francis Edward Stuart, House of Stuart

Date of the "Thirty years war" and German Genocide of Blacks (1618–1648)
Dates of the British civil wars and British Genocide of Blacks (1639 - 1652), (1689), (1715 - 1745):

Portrait of a Caucasian looking James II & VII

James II & VII, House of Stuart, (14 October 1633O.S. – 16 September 1701) was King of England and King of Ireland as James II and King of Scots as James VII, from 6 February 1685. He was the last Catholic monarch to reign over the Kingdoms of England, Scotland, and Ireland.

Members of Britain's political and religious elite increasingly opposed him for being pro-French and pro-Catholic, and for his designs on becoming an absolute monarch.

When he produced a Catholic heir, the tension exploded, and leading nobles called on William III of Orange (his son-in-law and nephew) to land an invasion army from the Netherlands, which he did.

James fled England (and thus was held to have abdicated) in the Glorious Revolution of 1688. He was replaced by William of Orange who became king as William III, ruling jointly with his wife (James's daughter) Mary II.

The Glorious Revolution also called the Revolution of 1688, is the overthrow of King James II of England (James VII of Scotland and James II of Ireland) by a union of English Parliamentarians with the Dutch stadtholder William III of Orange-Nassau (William of Orange). William's successful invasion of England with a Dutch fleet and army led to his ascending the English throne as William III of England jointly with his wife Mary II of England.

James Francis Edward Stuart son of  James II - CONFIRMED!

Thus William and Mary, both Protestants, became joint rulers in 1689. James made one serious attempt to recover his crowns when he landed in Ireland in 1689 but, after the defeat of the Jacobite forces by the Williamite forces at the Battle of the Boyne in the summer of 1690, James returned to France.

He lived out the rest of his life as a pretender at a court sponsored by his cousin and ally, King Louis XIV.

The Jacobite Wars - No accurate estimate of causalities: The Jacobite Risings were a series of uprisings, rebellions, and wars in Great Britain and Ireland occurring between 1688 and 1746.

The uprisings were aimed at returning James VII of Scotland and II of England, and later his descendants of the House of Stuart, to the throne after he was deposed by Parliament during the Glorious Revolution. The series of conflicts takes its name from Jacobus, the Latin form of James.

The major Jacobite Risings were called the Jacobite Rebellions by the ruling governments. The "First Jacobite Rebellion" and "Second Jacobite Rebellion" were known respectively as "The Fifteen" and "The Forty-Five", after the years in which they occurred (1715 and 1745).

Although each Jacobite rising had unique features, they were part of a larger series of military campaigns by Jacobites attempting to restore the Stuart kings to the thrones of Scotland and England (and after 1707, Great Britain). James was deposed in 1688 and the thrones were claimed by his daughter Mary II jointly with her husband, the Dutch-born William of Orange.

After the House of Hanover succeeded to the British throne in 1714, the risings continued and intensified. They continued until the last Jacobite Rebellion ("the Forty-Five"), led by Charles Edward Stuart (the Young Pretender), who was soundly defeated at the Battle of Culloden in 1746. This ended any realistic hope of a Stuart restoration.

French Propaganda about James Francis Edward Stuart III

James Francis Edward Stuart - CONFIRMED! James Francis Edward, Prince of Wales (the Chevalier de St George, "The King Over the Water", "The Old Pretender" or "The Old Chevalier"; (1688–1766) was the son of the deposed James II of England and Ireland (James VII of Scotland). As such, he claimed the English, Scottish and Irish thrones (as James III of England and Ireland and James VIII of Scotland) from the death of his father in 1701, when he was recognised as the king of England, Scotland and Ireland by his cousin Louis XIV of France.

Obviously, the Black Scottish people were incredibly loyal to their legitimate Black kings. Thus while their kings were in exile, there was a great yearning for pictures of them. Troy and his assistants serviced this need with unknown quantities of portraits of them.

Even though many people took part in painting those portraits, they would all have looked as much alike as humanly possible, with regards to the person's features, though backgrounds and clothing could change. This portrait, like the Holy Roman Empire Emperor Charles V portrait, was likely hidden away, and thus escaped whitewashed Caucasian type destruction with the rest. The White man as James below, may, or may not be a real person. In any case, it is part of the conspiracy of the Caucasian type narratives to create fake artefacts to replace the real ones, in support of the fake history the Caucasian have created to explain their position of rule.

Fake James Francis Edward Stuart III

Following his death in 1766, he was succeeded by his son Charles Edward Stuart in the Jacobite Succession. Had his father not been deposed, there would have been only two monarchs during his lifetime; his father and himself. In reality, there were seven; his father, William III, Mary II, Anne, George I, George II and George III.

Although the ruling Protestant Stuarts died out with his half-sister, Queen Anne, the last remaining Stuarts were James and his sons, and their endeavours to reclaim the throne while remaining devoted to their Catholic faith are remembered in history as Jacobitism.

Most Truths is "half-false" and most Falsehoods is "half-truth". These statements are ambiguous, unspecific and neither here nor there, at first without dissembling them any further.

However, we will prove beyond any reasonable doubt that these statements can be concise, precise, specific, unambiguous and accurate in certain suppositions. For example, the argument between authors and general members of the public pertaining to "The myth of Scottish slaves in the Caribbean", or "The reality of Scottish slaves in the Caribbean". However, both titles are "half-false" and "half-true".

These authors are both spectacularly wrong in relation to indentured Black Scots (not slaves), Black Scots and Black Scottish aristocrats. They assumed just because they are unaware of black people who had been living in Scotland for thousands of years before them, they physically did not exist.

It is quite frightening how little all these authors, as well the general public knew about Scottish black history. In a bite-size and piece by piece, we will expose this lack of knowledge via their argument, which is useful to them in their assertions but totally misrepresented in ours. Second Scenario part a:

The Barbados Penny, Depicting Negro Looking King George III, House of Hanover 

Even more so, the Caucasian type narrative has created fake portraits and statues of their Black Kings, depicting them falsely as Caucasians. But sometimes, innocuous-seeming remnants survived and were overlooked. When they are discovered, the Caucasian type narrative concocted outrageously stupid scenarios to explain their existence. Such is the case with the Barbados Penny:

The Caucasian type historians want us to believe that they would continually mint coins with the head of one of their chattel Slaves, in Kingly fashion, wearing the sacred symbol of the British Empire and People, the British crown, and later deny these coins authenticity by citing forgery. Which self-respecting forger, past or present, would forge coins and in getting the racial identity spectacularly wrong, hopes to prosper, from such a terrible forgery? The very same Slaves who when they were not brutalising or killing them, they worried that the Slaves would kill them.

The Regal Circlet Crown of Queen Victoria 1819 - 1901 AD

And the most Alarming and Disturbing things about the image of Caucasian looking James Francis Edward Stuart III and James II is that they would be the portrait hanging on 99% of the Schools, Colleges, and Universities around the world now. It is another case of the 6 Ds, Deceitful, Deceptive, Dishonest, Dis-informative, Dumb and Dubious, including the propaganda of portraying him as a mere Painter by the French.

King George III, Mulatto looking

Let us not forget that Caucasian type narratives have also claimed to be Egyptians and Persians, as well as other original people, in environments where a Caucasian in the native clothing could not survive the Sun.

Just like they came up with a fake explanation for their Whiteness - Vitamin D, Balderdash and Piffle!

Second Scenario part b: The White Slaves narrative: The myth of Scottish slaves in the Caribbean is a sub-set of a narrative more commonly associated with the Irish in colonial America.

It has been underpinned by two polemical books: Theodore W. Allen’s The Invention of the White Race and more recently, Don Jordan and Michael Walsh’s White Cargo: The Forgotten History of Britain’s White Slaves in America. The authors were not professional historians. Allen was a writer and activist.

Jordan is a television director and Walsh a journalist, which perhaps explains the sensationalist interpretations of White Cargo.

The American historian Michael Guasco recently suggested the text should be read in ‘conjunction with more analytical and thoroughly contextualised works’ – a diplomatic way of urging caution when considering the authors’ conclusions. So, I had a look. Chapter sixteen concerns the Jacobites forcibly transported from Scotland after the uprisings in 1715 and 1746 who, according to the authors, were sometimes enslaved: those sent to the Caribbean were treated worse than those sent to America.

Whitened Bonnie Prince Charlie or the Young Pretender,

Son of James Francis Edward Stuart III, the Old Pretender.

There is no question that Jacobites were harshly dealt within what was a concerted attack on the Highland way of life – but they were never regarded or treated as chattel slaves.

Ironically, the White Cargo bibliography includes two books written by the late Anglo-Canadian journalist, John Prebble. According to Tom Devine, it is difficult to differentiate in Prebble’s work what was ‘based on reasonable research and what was the product of the imagination’.

Prebble’s ‘victim histories’ of Scotland (Glencoe, Culloden, The Highland Clearances and Darien) sold in huge numbers from the 1960s onward; exemplars of the Scottish school of pseudo-historio-graphical victimology. -Modern academics have added more nuance.

 For example, Darien (1698-1700) was indeed a disaster for Scotland and deliberate lack of support from the English in the Caribbean contributed to the death of many Scots. Whilst the slant of Prebble’s books defined a generation of victim-hood, popular histories have been replaced by online blogs. Elizabeth McQuillan’s:  ‘The hidden Scots victims of the slave trade’ in the Caledonian Mercury is completely devoid of any relevant historical evidence or analysis. Incredibly, after repeating the ‘white slaves myth’, the article suggests that ‘pressure groups [in Scotland] were looking for an official apology’ as their ancestors were white slaves.

Fake Painting about the Jacobite war

But let’s not forget the poorly planned venture represented a failed attempt at Scottish colonisation. Indeed, one scheme proposed by the Duke of Hamilton at Darien sought to import slaves to be worked to death in the gold mines of Panama.

This was not some romantic quest to establish a new society based upon Utopian socialist principles. It was a mercantilist venture designed to improve personal fortunes and Scotland’s balance of trade through colonisation and exploitation.

It seems almost embarrassing that the article ends with Robert Burns’s The Slaves Lament which concerns the African slave trade from Senegal to Virginia (a song he almost certainly didn’t author, according to Glasgow University experts. However, he nearly made a trip to Jamaica as a slave plantation overseer in 1786). Above: Fake Whitened painting depicting a scene from one of the Jacobite War.

This type of historical blog enters an echo-chamber of misinformation cited as credible sources, sometimes in response to articles about migration or the Scottish role in slavery. The ‘white slaves myth’, based upon weak foundations flourishes in the unchecked environment of the Internet. For those familiar with Hogan’s Law, this is nothing new.

A Whitened Painting of a Jacobite Royal Family, note the black boy depicted in the background

Liam Hogan has written articles on the myth of the Irish slaves, a myth which has been hijacked in America by right-wing groups and white supremacists to deflect from the legacy of black racialised chattel slavery and the ongoing quest for reparations in America. The Scottish white slaves strand differs from the Irish version in one important way. Whilst the Irish slaves myth has been used to cultivate white victimhood in America, the Scottish version is used mainly to deflect from the wider historical narrative of Scots involvement with British imperialism and specifically Caribbean slavery.

It wisnae us – white Scots were slaves first. It wisnae us – it was English. It wisnae us – it was the rich landowners. It wisnae us – the working classes weren’t involved. It wisnae us – it happened 200 years ago. Repeat ad nauseum. The end of the arguments they are having among themselves. Above: A Whitened Painting of a Jacobite Royal Family, note the black boy depicted in the background.

These aristocrats in England and Europe must really love young male Negro boys. Their explanation for this young male Negro boy in the painting, as a servant or a slave. at least they are consistent with their lies lol. End of part 4 of 7. The next blog 04/01/19: The Status and Ethnicity of the People of the Hebrides, Northern-Scotland, UK, and Black Indentures.

Charles Stuart II, House of Stuart, The Black Boy, Inn, Pubs

Charles II, House of Stuart, (29 May 1630 – 6 February 1685)

After the death of Cromwell in 1658, Charles's chances of regaining the Crown at first seemed slim as Cromwell was succeeded as Lord Protector by his son, Richard.

Charles I, House of Stuart, father of Charles II

However, the new Lord Protector, with no power base in either Parliament or the New Model Army, was forced to abdicate in 1659 and the Protectorate was abolished. During the civil and military unrest which followed, George Monck, the Governor of Scotland, was concerned that the nation would descend into anarchy.

Monck and his army marched into the City of London and forced the Rump Parliament to re-admit members of the Long Parliament excluded in December 1648 during Pride's Purge.

The Long Parliament dissolved itself and for the first time in almost 20 years, there was a general election. The outgoing Parliament designed the electoral qualifications so as to ensure, as they thought, the return of a Presbyterian majority. The restrictions against royalist candidates and voters were widely ignored, and the elections resulted in a House of Commons which was fairly evenly divided on political grounds between Royalists and Parliamentarians and on religious grounds between Anglicans and Presbyterians.

The new so-called Convention Parliament assembled on 25 April 1660, and soon afterward received news of the Declaration of Breda, in which Charles agreed, amongst other things, to pardon many of his father's enemies. The English Parliament resolved to proclaim Charles king and invite him to return, a message that reached Charles at Breda on 8 May 1660.

A Caucasian type portrait of Charles II

In Ireland, a convention had been called earlier in the year, and on 14 May it declared for Charles II as King. Charles II, who dated his accession from the death of his father, did not take up the reins of government until the restoration of the monarchy in 1660. After 1660, all legal documents were dated as if Charles had succeeded his father as king in 1649.

In that same year, Charles I was canonised as Saint Charles Stuart and King Charles the Martyr by the Church of England and is venerated throughout the Anglican Communion. Charles's English parliament enacted laws known as the Clarendon Code, designed to shore up the position of the re-established Church of England. Charles acquiesced to the Clarendon Code even though he himself favoured a policy of religious tolerance.

The major foreign policy issue of Charles's early reign was the Second Anglo-Dutch War. In 1670, Charles entered into the secret treaty of Dover, an alliance with his first cousin King Louis XIV of France. Louis agreed to aid Charles in the Third Anglo-Dutch War and pay Charles a pension, and Charles secretly promised to convert to Roman Catholicism at an unspecified future date. Charles attempted to introduce religious freedom for Catholics and Protestant dissenters with his 1672 Royal Declaration of Indulgence, but the English Parliament forced him to withdraw it.

In 1679, Titus Oates's revelations of a supposed "Popish Plot" sparked the Exclusion Crisis when it was revealed that Charles's brother and heir (James, Duke of York) was a Roman Catholic. The crisis saw the birth of the pro-exclusion Whig and anti-exclusion Tory parties. Charles sided with the Tories, and, following the discovery of the Rye House Plot to murder Charles and James in 1683, some Whig leaders were killed or forced into exile.

Charles II, House of Stuart, The Black Boy

Charles dissolved the English Parliament in 1681 and ruled alone until his death on 6 February 1685.

He was received into the Roman Catholic Church on his deathbed. Charles was popularly known as the Merrie Monarch, in reference to both the liveliness and hedonism of his court and the general relief at the return to normality after over a decade of rule by Oliver Cromwell and the Puritans.

Charles's wife, Catherine of Braganza, bore no children, but Charles acknowledged at least 12 illegitimate children by various mistresses.

As illegitimate children were excluded from the succession, he was succeeded by his brother James. Note; in reading these excerpts from the book, please ignore the obvious Albino nonsense, and the obviously bogus Whitened portrait, and stay with the facts. Quote:

First of all, he had abnormal darkness of complexion, a truly saturnine tint. This darkness was the subject of comment from first. His mother wrote jokingly to her sister-in-law that she had given birth to a black baby and to a friend in France that 'he was so dark that she was ashamed of him'. She would send his portrait 'as soon as he is a little fairer'. But Charles never did become fairer. Later the sobriquet 'the Black Boy' would be used, still commemorated in English Inn/Pubs signs.

There was even a 'fanatic' fantasy at the time of the Popish Plot in the 1670s, that Charles had been fathered on Henrietta Maria (see her image below), by a 'black Scotsman' - a neat combination of the two prejudices of the time, against the Catholics and the Scots. So it became convenient to refer to the then King as that 'black Bastard'.

Henrietta Maria/Marie, mother of Charles II

Most Truths are "half-false" and most Falsehoods are "half-truth". These statements are ambiguous, unspecific and neither here nor there, at first without dissembling them any further. It is the fourth Natural law relating to Polarity. However, we will prove beyond any reasonable doubt that these statements can be concise, precise, specific, unambiguous and accurate in certain suppositions.

For example, the argument between a Pub (Public House, an Inn) and general members of the public pertaining to The Black Boy Symbol displayed in front of their Pubs, Inns, Hotels or Bread and Breakfast facilities. "Are they Racist Symbols, or Genuine Tradition in celebrating English history?" However, this is a good example scenario to demonstrate the law of Polarity in action. Both Questions are "half-false" and "half-true".

These pubs (Public House, an Inn), Hotels and Guesthouses and general members of the public are both spectacularly wrong in relation as to the truth behind Black Boy Charles Stuart II and The Black Boy Symbol. Those that knew about  Charles Stuart II historicity assumed that he was a Caucasian monarch and blissfully unaware of the Black king narratives because they had been taught in Schools, Colleges and Universities, including the mainstream media otherwise, incorporating Black and White people alike.

Those that wanted the sign to remain stating Historical importance of such symbols and those that wanted it to be taking down sighting Racism, both based their reasons on Misinformed historicity of Black history in Europe. There are two different instances of these real-life scenarios that will display the blissful ignorance of the general public and the mainstream media, graphically and contextually.

The Black Boy, King Charles II, right King wrong Colour

First Scenario: Telegraph Reporters 21 JANUARY 2017 4:00PM
A pub firm has backed down on its mission to rename a pub called The Black Boy after locals complained. Barons Pub Company took over the 500-year-old inn at Shinfield, near Reading, this week and suggested changing its name to the more politically correct Shinfield Arms.

They said there had been “negative comments” over the Black Boy name. But following the announcement, 250 people went on social media to protest about the change.

The firm said they suggested the idea of changing the pub’s name because ‘The Black Boy’ was “causing concern”. A spokesman said: “We are always respectful of the history of pubs and understand that changing the name of a pub is not a decision to be taken lightly.

“However in our short association with the pub, we have been surprised by how many negative reactions we have had to the name The Black Boy. We are proposing to change the name to The Shinfield Arms and would like to hear the views of anyone who lives in the area or anyone who has an opinion on this subject.”

After hundreds of comments from customers urging the pub to keep its historical name, the pub said today it wouldn’t change it. The company said: “What a fantastic response from everyone. Thanks so much for all your comments, your passion, and enthusiasm - you’ve made the decision really easy.”

The Black Boy, a Drummer Boy in the Army

One social media user said: “It's not offensive. It's a historic name that refers back to the English civil war.” The pub’s website says there are “many interesting theories” as to how the Inn acquired its “unusual” name. It says: “As the pub was around during the reign of Charles II, it is supposed that it and other Black Boy pubs around the country were named after the king, who was renowned partly for his swarthy complexion. “Alternatively, many believe that the name comes from a famous dark figurine smoking a pipe that once adorned the doorway."

The Black Boy, now a Chimney Sweeper

In a bite-size and piece by piece, we will expose this lack of knowledge via their argument, which is useful to them in their assertions but totally misrepresented in ours. By presenting our evidence in a legal format.

1.  An eye witness account as evidence is first among equals and second to none in comparison to Hearsay, Rumour, Gossips, Assertions, Assumptions, Presumptions, Speculations, and Suppositions. 2.  An eye witness account that is supported by images albeit contrasting, is even more powerful in the court of law.

Starting by the definition of the word "Swarthy", as to ascertain its meaning. "The word Stuart comes from the old Nordish root Svart which means black. Stuart is the same word as Swarthy, which means black in old English."

Svart, Stuart, Stewart, Swart or Swarthy. According to Alison Weir in her book: Pertaining to Elizabeth I - She has a swarthy, "Olive" complexion like that of mother, although she made a habit of Whitening it with a lotion made up of egg-whites, powdered eggshell, poppy seeds, borax, and alum, which made her face appear White and luminous. From her father, she had her red naturally curly hair.  Let us examine the statement about Whitening her face, including having a complexion like that of her father.

 If Elizabeth I was a pale skin Caucasian as they claimed, she has no need to go to such an extraordinary length to Whitened her face. This also applies to Elizabeth I father (Henry VIII) because they have similar skin complexion, therefore both father and daughter must be at least a Mulatto (Mixed Race). Well, the fact is that Olives are Green or Black, no Humans have Green Skin.

The Black Boy, as a Sailor

According to Henrietta Marie mother of Charles II in her own word in a letter to her sister-in-law: First of all, he had abnormal darkness of complexion, a truly saturnine tint. This darkness was the subject of comment from first.

His mother wrote jokingly to her sister-in-law that she had given birth to a black baby and to a friend in France that 'he was so dark that she was ashamed of him'. She would send his portrait 'as soon as he is a little fairer'. This is an eye witness account supported by the images of the true king Charles II and a Falsified one.

It is quite frightening how little all these Authors, Bloggers, Graduates, Teachers, Professors, Politicians, and the General Public knew about Black Boy Charles Stuart II. Even more so, the Caucasian type narrative has created fake portraits and statues of their Black Kings, depicting them falsely as Caucasians. But sometimes, innocuous-seeming remnants survived and were overlooked.

Finally due, these general campaigns and promotion of the falsified history of Black people in Europe as Slaves, Servants, Beggars, being-Kidnapped or the Prince even the king of Congo. As a direct result of all these misinformation: King Charles II, the Black Boy has been depicted as different things by different Inn-keepers.

The Black Boy depicted as a Black Horse

They first depicted him correctly as King Charles II, but Caucasian type. The second one depicted him as a Drummer in the Army, the third one depicted him as a Chimney-sweeper, the fourth depicted him as a Sailor, the fifth depicted him as a Black Horse and the last one in Oxford, England, has no Symbol at all due to political correctness that has gone mad or Protests.

The same Oxford City that has no Black community Centre while every other major city in the UK has them. What a joke, but it is not funny at all. It is only Birmingham University, in Birmingham England, UK, that facilitates Black history as a course, in its own right, in the whole of Europe.

The Black Boy, Oxford City, England, UK, No Symbol at all

And the facilitation of this course only commences at Birmingham University a couple of years ago.

The irony is that there are plenty of American Universities, specifically the USA, that has been and still facilitating Black history as a course, in its own right and still remain the most racist country on the planet.

In addition, due to falsified history being taught to us in Schools, Colleges, Universities, including Books, Social-Media or regurgitated via the Main-Stream-Media, we unconsciously set in motion the powerful force of Cause and Effect, no 6 out of 8 Natural Laws, called The Principle of Cause and Effect. And subconsciously set in motion The Principle of CARE, the encapsulating principle of the other principles, to Cause an Effect that Erases another evidence of Black history from European type narratives.

Anne Boleyn, mother of Elizabeth I

This is tantamount to a comedy of ironies based of false narratives in which we subconsciously unleashed the oculist forces of the 6th and 8th natural law, via wrong assumptions and presumptions as a causation to change the effect we perceived to feel, in our perception of history, Black and White alike, into a positive effect that which we considered negative. For example:

Those that wanted the signs taken down due to the perceived racist symbol it represent and those that wanted it to stay up believing he was a Caucasian king are both wrongs in their assertions.

Be careful what you CARE about because` unwittingly scenario 1 incorporates the 4th, 6th, and 8th Natural law, being subconsciously invoked, by the general public, Black and White alike, to cause and effect a favourable effect.

By considering and picking one side of the argument (Conceiving), by caring enough about the subject matter, and going into planning mode with others on social media or physically (Conceiving Care), and by actually executing a social media or physical campaign (CARE Action). Finally the innkeeper's decision as to Nay or Ye, a positive or negative manifestation of Action via CARE. This is the same occult principles that the elite has always utilised to rule and control us for thousands of years but consciously.

Therefore, let all these debunking tunes your mind away from the frequency of falsehood. The end of part 3 of 7. I rest my case in relation to Black Boy Charles Stuart II, First Scenario. Next blog 01/01/19. Debunking the Barbados Penny and James Edward Stuart III, including presenting the Second Scenario.

Stuart, James VI & I, Charles I, House of Stuart

In total, nine Stewart monarchs ruled just Scotland from 1371 until 1603. After this there was a Union of the Crowns under James VI & I who had become the senior genealogical claimant to all of the holdings of the extinct House of Tudor.

James the VI of Scotland and the I of England? 

Thus there were six Stuart monarchs who ruled both England and Scotland as well as Ireland (although the Stuart era was interrupted by an interregnum lasting from 1649–1660, as a result of the English Civil War).

Additionally, at the foundation of the Kingdom of Great Britain after the Acts of Union, which politically united England and Scotland, the first monarch was Anne of Great Britain. After her death, all the holdings passed to the House of Hanover, under the terms of the Act of Settlement 1701. Are these engravings of King James (of James VI and I, House of Stuart, racially accurate? During the reign of the Stewarts, Scotland developed from a relatively poor and feudal country into a prosperous, fairly modern and centralised state.

They ruled during a time in European history of transition from the Middle Ages to the Renaissance. Monarchs such as James IV were known for sponsoring exponents of the Northern Renaissance such as poet Robert Henryson. After the Stewarts gained control of all of Great Britain, the arts and sciences continued to develop; many of William Shakespeare's best known plays were authored during the Jacobean era, while institutions such as the Royal Society and Royal Mail were established during the reign of Charles II.

Mary Stuart, Queen of the Scot 

James VI and I, House of Stuart, (19 June 1566 – 27 March 1625) was King of Scots as James VI from 24 July 1567 and King of England and Ireland as James I from the union of the English and Scottish crowns on 24 March 1603 until his death.

The kingdoms of England and Scotland were individual sovereign states, with their own parliaments, judiciary, and laws, though both were ruled by James in personal union.

He became King of Scotland at the age of thirteen months, succeeding his mother Mary, Queen of Scots, who had been compelled to abdicate in his favour.

Four different regents governed during his minority, which ended officially in 1578, though he did not gain full control of his government until 1583. In 1603, he succeeded the last Tudor monarch of England and Ireland, Elizabeth I, who died without issue. He continued to reign in all three kingdoms for 22 years, often using the title King of Great Britain and Ireland, until his death in 1625 at the age of 58. He based himself in England (the largest of the three realms) from 1603.

Lord Henry Darnley, House of Stuart

James began the Plantation of Ulster and of North America. Regents: James Stewart, Earl of Moray, Matthew Stewart, Earl of Lennox, John Erskine, Earl of Mar, James Douglas, Earl of Morton.

Mary, Queen of Scots, House of Stuart, (8 December 1542 – 8 February 1587), also known as Mary Stuart or Mary I of Scotland, was queen regnant of Scotland from 14 December 1542 to 24 July 1567 and queen consort of France from 10 July 1559 to 5 December 1560.

Mary was the only surviving legitimate child of King James V of Scots. She was 6 days old when her father died and she was crowned nine months later. In 1558, she married Francis, Dauphin of France.

He ascended the French throne as King Francis II in 1559, and Mary became queen consort of France until she was widowed on 5 December 1560. Mary then returned to Scotland, arriving in Leith on 19 August 1561. Four years later, she married her first cousin, Henry Stuart, Lord Darnley. Their union was unhappy and in February 1567, there was a huge explosion at their house, and Darnley was found dead, apparently strangled, in the garden.

John Erskine, Earl of Mar

She soon married the 4th Earl of Bothwell, who was generally believed to be Darnley's murderer. Following an uprising against the couple, Queen Mary was imprisoned in Loch Leven Castle on 15 June and forced to abdicate in favour of her one-year-old son, King James VI.

After an unsuccessful attempt to regain the throne, Mary fled to England seeking the protection of her first cousin once removed, Queen Elizabeth I of England.

Mary had previously claimed Elizabeth's throne as her own and was considered the legitimate sovereign of England by many English Catholics, including participants in the Rising of the North.

Perceiving her as a threat, Queen Elizabeth had her arrested. After 19 years in custody in a number of castles and manor houses in England, she was tried and executed for treason for her alleged involvement in three plots to assassinate Elizabeth. Elizabeth of Bohemia (19 August 1596 – 13 February 1662) was the eldest daughter of King James VI and I, King of Scotland, England, Ireland, and Anne of Denmark.

As the wife of Frederick V, Elector Palatine, she was Electress Palatine and briefly Queen of Bohemia. Due to her husband's short reign in Bohemia, Elizabeth is often referred to as the Winter Queen. With the demise of the Stuart dynasty in 1714, her descendants, the Hanoverian rulers, succeeded to the British throne.

Charles I, House of Stuart

Charles I, House of Stuart, (19 November 1600 – 30 January 1649) was King of England, King of Scotland, and King of Ireland from 27 March 1625 until his execution in 1649.

Charles engaged in a struggle for power with the Parliament of England, attempting to obtain royal revenue whilst Parliament sought to curb his Royal prerogative which Charles believed was divinely ordained.

 Many of his English subjects opposed his actions, in particular, his interference in the English and Scottish Churches and the levying of taxes without parliamentary consent which grew to be seen as those of a tyrannical absolute monarch. Religious conflicts permeated Charles's reign.

His failure to successfully aid Protestant forces during the Thirty Years' War, coupled with such actions as marrying a Catholic princess, generated deep mistrust concerning the king's dogma. Charles further allied himself with controversial religious figures, such as the ecclesiastic Richard Montague, and William Laud, whom Charles appointed Archbishop of Canterbury. Many of Charles' subjects felt this brought the Church of England too close to the Catholic Church.

Charles' later attempts to force religious reforms upon Scotland led to the Bishops' Wars, strengthened the position of the English and Scottish Parliaments and helped precipitate the king's downfall. Charles' last years were marked by the English Civil War, in which he fought the forces of the English and Scottish Parliaments, which challenged the king's attempts to overrule and negate Parliamentary authority.

Henrietta Marie wife of Charles I

Whilst simultaneously using his position as head of the English Church to pursue religious policies which generated the antipathy of reformed groups such as the Puritans.

Charles was defeated in the First Civil War (1642–45), after which Parliament expected him to accept its demands for a constitutional monarchy.

He instead remained defiant by attempting to forge an alliance with Scotland and escaping to the Isle of Wight. This provoked the Second Civil War (1648–49) and a second defeat for Charles, who was subsequently captured, tried, convicted, and executed for high treason.

The monarchy was then abolished and a republic called the Commonwealth of England, also referred to as the Cromwellian Interregnum, was declared.

Convention uses the name "The English Civil War" (1642–51) to refer collectively to the civil wars in England and the Scottish Civil War, which began with the raising of King Charles I's standard at Nottingham on 22 August 1642 and ended on 3 September 1651 at the Battle of Worcester. There was some continued organised Royalist resistance in Scotland, which lasted until the surrender of Dunnottar Castle to Parliament's troops in May 1652, but this resistance is not usually included as part of the English Civil War.

End of Part 2 of 7. The next blog 28/12/18. Revealing the true colour of King Charles II, House of Stuart, AKA the Black Boy piece by piece like a detective.

Thomas Cromwell, Oliver Cromwell, Henry VIII, Elizabeth I, Mary I

This is a 7 part article starting with Thomas Cromwell and his almost completed destruction of almost all the evidence of Black Rule in Britain. Followed by Caucasian type portraits of Black kings and Queens, in the British Library, and the physical description of and images of King Henry VIII, including Queen Mary I and Elizabeth I. Next an introduction to the House of Stuarts/Stewarts, Black Scottish aristocrats. All in this article.

Thomas Cromwell

It was Thomas Cromwell who destroyed almost all evidence of Black Rule in Britain? Article from the Daily Telegraph Media Group Limited Jan 2015. Main Quote: No one can be sure of the exact figure, but it is estimated that the destruction started and legalised by Cromwell amounted to 97% of the English art then in existence. Statues were hacked down. Frescoes were smashed to bits. Mosaics were pulverised. Illuminated manuscripts were shredded.

Wooden carvings were burned. Precious metalwork was melted down. Shrines were reduced to rubble. This vandalism went way beyond a religious reform. It was a frenzy, obliterating the artistic patrimony of centuries of indigenous craftsmanship with an intensity of hatred for imagery and depicting the divine that has strong and resonant parallels today.

The British Library
The British Library has thousands upon thousands of Illuminated Manuscripts, which look very old, of course, if Thomas Cromwell destroyed 97% of Britain's artifacts, then most of those manuscripts are FAKE, which of course they are. However, some are real, this we know because these contain Black people, the fakes, as would be expected, are completely devoid of Black people.

Thomas Cranmer, Archbishop of Canterbury

Although Henry VIII had severed the link between the Church of England and Rome, he never permitted the renunciation of Catholic doctrine or ceremony. It was during Edward's reign that Protestantism was established for the first time in England with reforms that included the abolition of clerical celibacy and the Mass and the imposition of compulsory services in English.

The architect of these reforms was Thomas Cranmer, Archbishop of Canterbury, whose Book of Common Prayer has proved lasting. In February 1553, at age 15, Edward fell ill. When his sickness was discovered to be terminal, he and his Council drew up a "Devise for the Succession", attempting to prevent the country being returned to Catholicism. Edward named his cousin Lady Jane Grey as his heir and excluded his half-sisters, Mary and Elizabeth.

Mary I, House of Tudor, (18 February 1516 – 17 November 1558) was queen regnant of England and Ireland from July 1553 until her death. She was the only surviving child born of the ill-fated marriage of Henry VIII and his first wife Catherine of Aragon. Her younger half-brother, Edward VI, succeeded Henry in 1547. By 1553, Edward was mortally ill and because of religious differences between them, he attempted to remove Mary from the line of succession.

Henry VIII at 12 years old

On his death, their cousin Lady Jane Grey was at first proclaimed queen. Mary assembled a force in East Anglia and successfully deposed Jane, who was ultimately beheaded. In 1554, Mary married Philip of Spain, and as a result, became queen consort of Habsburg Spain on his accession in 1556.

 As the fourth crowned monarch of the Tudor dynasty, Mary is remembered for her restoration of Roman Catholicism after the short-lived Protestant reign of her brother.

During her five year reign, she had over 280 religious dissenters burned at the stake in the Marian Persecutions. Her Protestant opponents gave her the sobriquet of "Bloody Mary". Her re-establishment of Roman Catholicism was reversed after her death in 1558 by her successor and a younger half-sister, Elizabeth I.

Elizabeth I: Elizabeth I, House of Tudor, (7 September 1533 – 24 March 1603) was queen regnant of England and Ireland from 17 November 1558 until her death. Sometimes called The Virgin Queen, Gloriana, or Good Queen Bess, Elizabeth was the fifth and last monarch of the Tudor dynasty.

Mary I, House of Tudor

The daughter of Henry VIII, she was born a princess, but her mother, Anne Boleyn, was executed two and a half years after her birth, and Elizabeth was declared illegitimate. Her half-brother, Edward VI, bequeathed the crown to Lady Jane Grey, cutting his half-sisters out of the succession.

His will was set aside, Lady Jane Grey was executed, and in 1558 Elizabeth succeeded the Catholic Mary I, during whose reign she had been imprisoned for nearly a year on suspicion of supporting Protestant rebels.

In her book “Elizabeth the Queen”, Alison Weir describes the 25-year-old Elizabeth as: “Tall and slender, with a tiny waist, small bosom, and beautiful, long-fingered hands, which it pleased her vanity to display to advantage in a variety of affected poses. She had a swarthy complexion like that of her mother (Anne Boleyn). The Caucasian type narrators often like to use words that will cause confusion when discussing the race and appearance of non-Caucasians, so as to make them sound more Caucasian if they are important people. Such is the case with Queen Elizabeth I, who is described as swarthy: so first, let us clearly define swarthy.

Webster's: of a dark color, complexion, or cast. The etymology of swarthy: Alteration of swarthy, from swart +? -y, Old English sweart, "Black". In the book "Native Arctic tribes of the former Soviet Union" the Nenet people are described as Swarthy: Quote from the Nenets: "Due to dark pigmentation, hair and eyes are black or brown and the skin is swarthy.

Queen Elizabeth I, unknown artist 1575 AD

In appearance the Nenets resemble most the Ostyaks, displaying, however, more Mongoloid characteristics." Luckily we happen to have a picture of a Nenet boy, with this picture we can clearly see what the Albinos mean when they say "Swarthy".

For those who find the page picture above hard to read, here is what it says:

Elizabeth - She has a swarthy, "Olive" complexion like that of her mother, although she made a habit of Whitening it with a lotion made up of egg-whites, powdered eggshell, poppy seeds, borax, and alum, which made her face appear White and luminous. From her father, she had her red naturally curly hair.

As we can see from that quote, the writer Alison Weir is trying to confuse us by using the term "Olive" complexion, which hankers back to the mythical "Mediterranean" race.

Well, the fact is that Olives are Green or Black, no Humans have Green Skin, and those so-called modern "Mediterranean's" are the Mulattoes of the many Caucasian invaders of North Africa and the middle East. Below are two pictures of Mary Queen of Scots - also with that "Naturally Curly Hair". Black people call it "Kinky" hair - they ought to know. We won't even bother with why the portraits of Henry VIII show no sign of curly hair.

Nenet Boy

Much has been made of Elizabeth's so-called "Licence to Deport Black People" found in Tudor Royal Proclamations, vol. 3, pp. 221-2 (c. January 1601). As usual, the Albinos busy themselves creating bogus race history.

By crude translation, the Proclamation calls for those Blackamoors (North African Muslims - whose religion is mentioned: called "Infidels, having no understanding of Christ or his Gospel"), of ten in number, brought into the country by Sir Thomas Baskerville, be gathered up and transported to Spain in exchange for English prisoners being held there.

Somehow, by Caucasian imagination or collusion, that came to be Elizabeth trying to get rid of Blacks in Britain. Of course, that is exactly what would happen later, when the Black Stuart's claim the crown.
Background: Sir Thomas Baskerville was commander of Queen Elizabeth’s troops in Picardy and served in the Netherlands, Spain, and Indies. He was also an Admiral and fought the Spanish on the Spanish Main with Sir Francis Drake, with whom he quarreled and parted company. There is extant a letter from Elizabeth I thanking him for his services.

Ann Boleyn

The Country Kingdom of Scotland, Kingdom of England, Kingdom of Ireland, Kingdom of France, Kingdom of Great Britain and Ancestral house Clan Stewart. Titles:

High Steward of Scotland, Earl of Lennox, Duke of Aubigny, Earl of Moray, Marquess of Bute, King of Scots, King of England, King of Ireland and Queen of Great Britain. Founder: Robert II of Scotland. The House of Stuart/Stewart)

Final sovereign: Anne of Great Britain. Current head: Extinct and Founding 1371. Cadet branches: Stewarts of Appin, Steuart of Ballechin, Stewarts of Castle Stewart, Stewarts of Galloway, Stewarts of Ardvorlich and Stewart of Darnley.

The House of Stuart (previously spelled Stewart) is a European royal house. Founded by Robert II of Scotland, the Stewarts first became monarchs of the Kingdom of Scotland during the late 14th century, and subsequently held the position of the Kings of Great Britain and Ireland.

Their patrilineal ancestors (from Brittany) had held the title High Steward of Scotland since the 12th century, after arriving by way of Norman England.

The dynasty inherited further territory by the 17th century which covered the entire British Isles, including the Kingdom of England and Kingdom of Ireland, also upholding a claim to the Kingdom of France.

Tomb of Marjory, mother of Robert II, Paisley Abbey, Scotland

Reminder: There is another old word used by the Anglo-Saxons to denote black or brown-black the word sweart.

The personal names Suart and Sueart (Stuart/Stewart) may have been derived from this word and may have originally denoted people of a dark-brown or black complexion.

The so-called black men of the Anglo-Saxon period probably included some of the darker Wendish people among them, immigrants or descendants of people of the same race as the ancestors of the Sorbs (Wends) of Lausatia (a region on the territory of Germany and Poland) on the borders of Saxony and Prussia at the present day (Germany). Some of the darker Wends may well have been among the Black Vikings referred to in the Irish annals.

End of part 1 of 7. Next blog 26/12/18, Part 2: House of Stuart/Stewart, Stuarty or Swarthy (Black or Brown) and the background history of Black Scottish and Irish Indentures to the Caribbean and America.